Bidvest Namibia FY14 Results Review

FY14 Results

BVN released its results for the year ended 30 June 2014. The firm posted reasonable results in light of the difficulties the fishing division finds itself in. EPS fell 10.6% to 129.6cps and HEPS decreased 10.4% to 129.5cps.

Costs almost sunk the ship

While BVN managed to grow revenues by 10.4% y/y to N$3.7bn, mainly attributed to the commercial businesses, cost of sales grew at 13.8% and operating costs by 36.9% to N$385.3m from the N$281.4m reported for FY13. The main reason for the witnessed cost increase was a sizable increase inquota rentals fees, following a reduction in direct quota allocation to BVN from the Ministry. Trading profit shrunk by 16.7% y/y to total N$501.3m. As usual, the fishing division supplied the largest chunk of trading profit, coming in at N$407.1m or 81%. This figure is 23.0% lower than the N$528.5m seen in FY13, despite the division’s individual revenue increasing by 4.6% y/y, reflecting depressed margins.

Price pressure

Price regulations in the Democratic Republic of Congo, coupled with artificially reduced demand from Nigeria following import restrictions, resulted in an oversupply in the company’s traditional markets, leading to a 18.6% decline in average realised selling price in US$ for horse mackerel. The weaker Namibian Dollar offset the lower US Dollar price effect on revenue, but also had a significant impact on costs. The weaker N$ is expected to remain the silver lining for this division, amidst cloudy conditions that prevail.

Uncertain outlook for Bidfish

The outlook for the fishing division remains challenging according to company management with uncertainties surrounding quota allocations. Additionally, we foresee the market price for horse-mackerel remaining depressed over the next year, as supply continues to outstrip satiable demand. The urgent application by Namsov against the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources as well as the Government over reductions in fishing quotas will be heard in the High Court on 9 October 2014, and the outcome of this courts decision will have a significant impact on the performance of the fishing division, especially in the first half of the 2015 financial year.

Valuation and Recommendation

The stock is currently trading on a FY16 yield of 4.68% based on full year dividends of 61cps at an assumed 54% payout ratio. This compares negatively to its average yield of 4.8% since listing, but remains a good yield in general.

The positive economic environment bodes well for the revenue growth in the commercial businesses, however weaker selling prices of horse-mackerel and lower quota allocations add strain torevenue growth in the fishing division, while the cost of securing additional quota will negatively affect the company’s bottom line, thus revenue and trading profit margins are expected to contract further through FY15 and decrease earnings visibility.

We have adjusted our earnings forecast and target price following a detailed analysis of the full year results. We forecast FY16 earnings of N$1.10 per share and calculate a warranted price of N$12.30 per share based on a justified PE ratio of 11.2 times. We are concerned about the possibility of a dividend cut given the outlook of the company, however we do not expect the stock to trade lower from current levels given the illiquidity of the stock and the possibility that once sold units may be difficult to rebuy in future, thereforewe change our BUYrecommendation to a HOLD recommendation.Based on our target price of N$13.00, the 12m total return is expected to be 4.3%.

Download (PDF, 350KB)

Equity and bond flows, the rand and the Top40

Equity and bond flows, the rand and the Top40

ZAR Top40 Bond Equity Flows

ZAR, TOP40 and Foreign Buying/Selling of SA Equities and Bonds

For many this will be intuitive, but as a bit of background – I have put the net buying (value> 0) and selling (value< 0) of SA bonds (SABO) and SA equities (SAEQ) – flows – on a single x-axis with the stock of buying/selling since the start of 2013, the USDZAR exchange rate and the TOP40 Index, to illustrate the effect of foreign flows on the rand exchange rate and Top40 performance.

It is worth noting that despite the notable depreciation in the rand seen over recent weeks, the stock (accumulated since the start of 2013) of foreign funds in SA remains high, when compared to the previous rand blowout in early 2014. Should these funds flow out in the manner that was seen in Jan/Feb 2014, the rand could weaken further, from already weak levels. Additionally, the recent sell-off on the JSE appears to have been precipitated by a selling of equities by foreigners, as we saw the first major net-selling of equities by foreigners in a number of months.

Alibaba IPO – The background

Alibaba is a Chinese e-commerce company, made up of various online outlets and functions. Their revenues are generated from a number of websites, such as Taobao.com and TMall.com, which provide online marketplaces in which buyers and sellers can conduct business in wholesale or retail trade. These sites generate income through subscription and advertising fees, however the company has sought to expand vertically over recent years, and items bought on these sites may be delivered by another Alibaba business, Cainiao. Additionally, payments for these items are processed by Alipay, also an Alibaba business.

The company’s party piece, however, is not its service offering alone, but the economies of scale that it captures. Consider that in 2013 more than half of all parcels sent in China were Alibaba parcels and you get some idea of the scope of the company. For the 12 months ending in June 2014 Alibaba had orders of US$300bn worth of goods on its platforms according to the LA Times. This is more than Amazon and EBay combined.

Alibaba (ticker: BABA) is listing on the NYSE today, 19 September 2014, and has rapidly become the most talked about stock IPO since Facebook’s IPO in May 2012. Raising US$21.8bn, before underwriters have exercised options to sell more shares of the oversubscribed IPO, makes Alibaba the biggest IPO in US history. If underwriters exercise their options to sell additional shares that number could rise to US$25bn making it the biggest IPO ever. At US$68 a share Alibaba’s market cap will be approximately US$168bn making it the third biggest internet company in the world, behind Google and Facebook.

Speculation that Alibaba will be using the funds raised today to break into the US market may be misguided. Cultural differences as well as logistics have kept Alibaba more or less on the side-lines of the US market compared to Amazon or EBay. Thus, many analysts believe that the new cash inflow may be most useful in expanding the company’s grip on the Chinese market. The company faces strong competition in its core businesses from smaller players. With the Chinese market in general still being in a developmental phase there is a lot of room for growth. Only about half of the Chinese population currently has access to the internet and as this expands so will Alibaba’s potential customer base. Thus Alibaba has to cement its place in the marketplace through growing its distribution network and operating efficiencies. As such, it is likely that a generous portion of the capital raised should go towards these efforts.

Buying a share of Alibaba does not however give you ownership rights in the company. It gives you a right to the profits of the Alibaba Group which are held by a Variable Interest Entity registered in the Cayman Islands. This structure is due to Chinese government restrictions on foreign ownership of Chinese companies. This is however not a unique occurrence as similar Chinese companies such as Baidu have been listed in the US for a number of years under the same structure. The Hong Kong Stock Exchange rejected Alibaba’s application to list on the exchange due to Alibaba’s ownership structure which aims to give a small number of current owners the right to elect the majority of the board. This means that the current owners will still have the majority say in the future of the company. Nevertheless, by buying into Alibaba, what you are getting is exposure to a Chinese company larger and more diversified than Baidu, which has been the largest US listed Chinese technology company up to now.

Because of the ownership structure, Alibaba shares cannot be included in the Standard and Poor’s 500 index. This means that any institutional investor with a mandate to track the index will not be able to buy the stock. Thus volatility in Alibaba will not have the same impact on the broader market as say a large index included stock would. Volatility may be higher than with index included stocks as index tracking funds are not required to hold the stock during bad times and good. Larger swings can be expected at least initially for this reason.

In conclusion, Alibaba may the best way for investors to gain exposure to a large Chinese technology company with a strong hold on their market and strong growth opportunities. An understanding of the ownership structure is essential to evaluating the risks associated with an Alibaba share purchase. Enthusiasm seems to be the outlook at the moment. Providing trading goes smoothly at the open today the underwriters expect a decent jump in the share price by close of business in New York.

tomorrowipo.com

tomorrowipo.com

Source: tomorrowipo.com

tomorrowipo.com

tomorrowipo.com

Source: tomorrowipo.com